Your DevOps team is currently using the local backend for your Terraform configuration. Which of the following backends would not work?

Using the local backend for Terraform configurations means that the state file is stored on the local file system. When considering other backend options, a version control system like Git does not work as a backend for storing Terraform state files. The nature of Git is to manage versioned files rather than serve as a storage solution for a single state file required by Terraform.

In contrast, other options such as AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, and Google Cloud Storage serve as proper remote backends. These services are designed to handle object storage, allowing Terraform to store and retrieve the state file reliably. They also facilitate collaboration by ensuring that the latest state is available to all team members, while also enabling locking features to prevent conflicts during concurrent runs.

Thus, the choice of using Git as a backend is not feasible because it does not meet the requirements for a remoter backend, specifically tailored for state management in Terraform deployments. This distinction clarifies why adopting Git in this context isn't a viable option, while cloud storage solutions are purpose-built for such integrations.